A page from the OpenDepot.org service

Jump to the start of the main contents

Ballinger, Clint Classifying contingency in the social sciences: Diachronic, synchronic, and deterministic contingency. Working Paper. none. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF - Draft Version
Download (280Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This article makes three claims concerning the concept of contingency. First, we argue that the word contingency is used in far too many ways to be useful. Its many meanings are detrimental to clarity of discussion and thought in history and the social sciences. We show how there are eight distinct uses of the word and illustrate this with numerous examples from the social sciences and history, highlighting the scope for confusion caused by the many, often contradictory uses of the term. Second, we impose some order on these uses through developing a threefold classification of contingency based on assumptions about possible worlds and determinism. Finally, we discuss why we believe that one of the classes is a special use of the word without relevance to the social sciences, while the two remaining classes are nothing more than a variety of the “no hidden factors” argument in the debate on indeterminism and determinism.

    Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
    Subjects: Social studies > Economics
    Social studies > Politics
    Social studies > Human and Social Geography
    Social studies > Others in Social studies > Social studies not elsewhere classified
    Historical and Philosophical studies
    Historical and Philosophical studies > Philosophy
    Historical and Philosophical studies > Philosophy > Philosophy of Science
    Divisions: UNSPECIFIED
    Depositing User: Dr. Clint Ballinger
    Date Deposited: 21 Oct 2012 17:19
    Last Modified: 21 Oct 2012 17:19
    URI: http://opendepot.org/id/eprint/1459

    Actions (login required)

    View Item